Legal Opinion

Citizens Bank of Lane v. Needham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1926No. 26,670; No. 26,673; No. 26,678; No. 26,804; No. 26,805PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff in each of these cases is an insolvent bank in process of liquidation, suing by its receiver. The defendant in each case is a stockholder of the bank. The purpose of each action was to enforce the stockholder’s double liability. Before his bank was finally closed, and while its capital was impaired, each defendant paid to the' bank, on account of his stock, which was fully paid up, an additional sum equal to par value of the stock. In each case the judgment of the district court sustained the contention of the receiver that,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Delano v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Woodworth v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Pape v. Capitol BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Cottrell v. ManloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gaiser v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Andrew v. Farmers Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Andrews v. State Ex Rel. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Russ, as Admrx. v. Golson, as ReceiverSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Baird v. EidsvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API