Legal Opinion
Lane v. Doan
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 5, 2003No. 6:00-cr-06110PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Warren Lane, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March 10, 2000. Although plaintiff initially appeared in the action pro se, the Court appointed counsel to represent plaintiff on February 12, 2002. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on December 23, 2002.
Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), asserts five causes of action against thirteen DOCS employees, alleging that defendants violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights in a number of ways during plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neal v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Jose Ortiz v. D. McBride Sgt. & R.O. Mara, Counselor of Arthur Kill Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Marvin v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Arnold v. GoetzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Rivera v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liner v. GoordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Jenkins v. RaubDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Daker v. FerreroDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- Stephenson v. DunfordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Garcia v. WardenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.