Legal Opinion
Marvin v. Goord
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 19, 2001No. Docket Nos. 00-0279(L), 99-0325PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Mark Marvin (“Marvin”), pro se and incarcerated, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that: (1) he was denied access to the courts because his legal mail was seized and because he was prohibited from sending any mail to his attorney for a 23 month period (“first claim”); (2) the New York State Board of Parole (“Board”) violated the ex post facto and due process clauses of the Constitution by denying his applications for work release and parole based on the Board’s classification of the crime for which he was convicted as “serious” (“second claim”); (3) employees…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Friedl v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Jose Ortiz v. D. McBride Sgt. & R.O. Mara, Counselor of Arthur Kill Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- John Stephen Larkin v. Patrick Savage, John Doe, John Rittenhouse, Charles Campisi, Anthony Cartusciello, and P.O. LodyzinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Hemphill v. New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Ruggiero v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Davis v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.