Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Arno Kuntz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1990No. 89-2182PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, defendant Robert Arno Kuntz challenges the constitutionality of section 5K1.1 of the federal sentencing guidelines. Defendant also alleges that the court below erred in not conducting a presentence evidentiary hearing on his claim of diminished capacity, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. We uphold the challenged guidelines section and affirm the sentence.
I
After defendant was indicted on one count of possession with intent to distribute more than one hundred kilograms of marijuana, he entered into a Memorandum of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Julio La Guardia, United States of America v. Eredia Josefa Jimenez-MinallaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Duvalier Antonio DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Levelt Francois, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Mark Marvin Musser, Gary Wayne Harvey, and Joseph Paul Abraham, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Ronnie HornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Robert J. Shewmaker, Sr., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Cerrato-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.