Legal Opinion

Huspen v. T & H, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1993No. Docket 139618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right from a circuit court determination that defendant’s rescission of a stock subscription agreement between plaintiff and defendant and defendant’s cancellation of the stocks issued to plaintiff were void. We affirm.

In 1987, plaintiff was issued 1,000 shares of defendant’s stock pursuant to a subscription agreement whereby plaintiff agreed to pay 50 cents a share. It appears that plaintiff obtained physical possession of the stock certificates. Plaintiff subsequently transferred the shares to various relatives, but retained voting rights pursuant to a voting trust…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Treasurer v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. Windall HillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Wayne County Sheriff v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Brown v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gorney v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re Durbin EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Ketchum v. DurbinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API