Legal Opinion

Gorney v. City of Madison Heights

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1995No. Docket 167631, 169807, 170886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated cases, plain tiffs appeal as of right the trial courts’ grant of summary disposition to defendants. The plaintiffs attack defendants’ property tax administration fees, which were adopted pursuant to MCL 211.44(7); MSA 7.87(7). We affirm.

The plaintiffs are property owners in the defendant cities. The defendants each had imposed a property tax administration fee, pursuant to legislation that allows local taxing units to assess a property tax administration fee if the local property tax collection unit approves the fee by ordinance or resolution. MCL 211.44(7); MSA 7.87(7).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Saginaw County v. John Sexton Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Westlake Transportation, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Dawson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Wayne County v. Plymouth Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API