Legal Opinion
Schuyleman v. Barnhart Crane and Rigging Co
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 8, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00562Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 JAY SCHUYLEMAN, CASE NO. C23-0562JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 BARNHART CRANE AND 13 RIGGING CO., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Defendants Barnhart Crane and Rigging Co. and Barnhart 17 Crane and Rigging, LLC’s (together, “Barnhart”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Jay 18 Schuyleman’s second amended complaint. (Mot. (Dkt. # 32); Reply (Dkt. # 37); see 19 SAC (Dkt. # 31).) Mr. Schuyleman opposes the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. # 35).) The court 20 has considered the motion, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.