Legal Opinion

National Shawmut Bank v. Citizens National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract. The plaintiff’s declaration in its final form was in a single count upon an account annexed. It was a count showing a balance due for money lent by the plaintiff to the defendant and not fully repaid, together with interest. The answer of the defendant set up "(1) a general denial, (2) payment, (3) that the act of borrowing was “ultra vires of the defendant,” (4) that there was no loan but an advance of money to be repaid only out of certain assets transferred to the plaintiff by the defendant, and that if the agreement between the parties touching the loan…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Aldrich v. Chemical National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Citizens' Central Nat. Bank of NY v. AppletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. W. W. Britton Inc. v. S. M. Hill Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Central Republic Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
  3. Falk v. LevineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945
  4. Herbert v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  5. Houston v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API