Falk v. Levine
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
The defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. They do not press at this stage their suggestion that the complaint must fail for laches and because of the statute of limitation.
The gist of the complaint is that the plaintiff and the individual defendants entered into a contract for the exploitation of a machine process for manufacturing plastics; that induced by the fraud of the individual defendants the plaintiff in consideration of $2,000 executed releases in favor of the individual defendants and the corporate defendant; and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Franz v. FranzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Nims v. Mount Hermon Boys' SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Max Holtzman, Inc. v. K & T CO., INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cassidy v. Millers Cas. Ins. Co. of TexasDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Piea Realty Co. Inc. v. PapuzynskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Perkins v. RemillardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
- Williams v. Walnut Park Plaza, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.