Last Chance Water Ditch Co. v. Emigrant Ditch Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial. Plaintiff is the proprietor of a water ditch, situate partly in Fresno county and partly in Kings county, through and by means of which it takes and supplies to its stockholders water which it has appropriated from Kings river for the irrigation of their lands situated along the line of the ditch. In 1894 the defendant constructed a canal known as the Fowler Switch canal, about thirty-two miles above the head of the plaintiffs ditch, through which it diverted a certain quantity of water from Kings river, and afterward…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moore v. Clear Lake Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Lower Kings River Water Ditch Co. v. Kings River & Fresno Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
- Drinkhouse v. Spring Valley Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. Selby Smelting and Lead Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Wood v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Mudge v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Carlsbad Irr. Dist. v. FordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.