Legal Opinion

Nanfito v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1919No. 20501PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: William A. Redick, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.

Cirino Dimauro, an employee of the defendant company, was struck by an engine of the company and killed iii its yards in Gibson, Nebraska; and the administrator of his estate brings this action to recover damages under the federal employers’ liability act. That act provides for liability "for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves, or other equipment.”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Hoffard v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pongruber v. PatrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. McIntosh v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Milk House Cheese Corp. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Eldon BeningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API