Legal Opinion

Dinsel v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 1956No. Civ. A. 13912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This is a petition in a proceeding under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., to direct C. W. Eckenrode, an employee of defendant corporation, to submit to an ophthalmological examination.

The facts are not in dispute that plaintiff and Eckenrode were employed together in the same gang, and that Eckenrode threw a stone from a freight car which struck plaintiff on the head while plaintiff was engaged in the furtherance of his employment in close proximity to the freight car where Eckenrode was engaged. Plaintiff predicates his primary allegation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eckenrode v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Johnson v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Dinsel v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Robert E. Lynn, Alicia J. Lynn v. William F. Smith, John E. Young, Charles Benedict, Henry J. Danielson, J. Regis Thompson, Charles AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Robert L. Schlagenhauf v. Cale J. Holder, United States District Judge for the Southern District of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  4. De Van v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. BreadySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API