Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Tennis Coal Company
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 25, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clay
Affirming.
The Tennis Coal Company brought this action on April 27, 1921, against McCager Holliday, Martha Holliday and Tolbert Holliday to quiet its title to a 273 acre tract of land in Perry county. On final hearing judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and the' defendants have appealed.
The prefatory part of the petition is as follows:
“The plaintiffs say that the Tennis Coal Company is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Kentucky, and that as such it is authorized to sue and be sued in its corporate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Luen v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Gillen v. Ill. Cent. Ry Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Hall v. Cumberland Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Crowley v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
- Harman v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Pioneer Coal, Company v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Holliday v. Cornett, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Holliday v. Tennis Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Holliday v. Tennis Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930