Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 28, 1988No. 61,749, No. 61,750PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

The State of Kansas, pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3603, appeals from a pretrial order suppressing physical evidence in two companion cases on the basis that the evidence had been obtained as a result of an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The two cases have been consolidated on appeal and were transferred to the Supreme Court pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c).

The facts are not disputed. On October 3, 1987, Curtis L. Smee was performing his duties at Webster State Park as an employee of the State Department of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  3. Morke v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  4. State v. BrittinghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Martin v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API