State v. Brittingham
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnson, J.:
The trial court found Christopher Brittingham guilty on two counts—-possession of drugs and possession of paraphernalia—based upon stipulated facts, after tire district court had denied Brittingham’s attempts to suppress his statements and the drug-related evidence as being products of an unlawful search and seizure. The drugs and paraphernalia were first observed in Brittingham’s apartment by a public housing employee who had made an uninvited entry into the apartment to check for potential damage from a sewer back-up at the facility. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. ToliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. RitcheyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- State v. VerkerkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. ParrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.