Legal Opinion

State v. Brittingham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 15, 2013No. 100,888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

The trial court found Christopher Brittingham guilty on two counts—-possession of drugs and possession of paraphernalia—based upon stipulated facts, after tire district court had denied Brittingham’s attempts to suppress his statements and the drug-related evidence as being products of an unlawful search and seizure. The drugs and paraphernalia were first observed in Brittingham’s apartment by a public housing employee who had made an uninvited entry into the apartment to check for potential damage from a sewer back-up at the facility. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. ToliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. RitcheyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. VerkerkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. ParrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API