Legal Opinion
Bank Building & Equipment Corp. v. Architectural Examining Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 28, 1965PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The named plaintiff and three individuals have purported to appeal to the Superior Court from orders of the defendant board. The claimed appeal is based on the authority of §§ 52-592 and 52-593 of the General Statutes. Insofar as material, §52-592 provides that “[i]f any action, commenced within the time limited by law, has failed one or more times to be tried on its merits . . . because the writ was abated, or has been erased from the docket for want of jurisdiction, or the action has been otherwise avoided or defeated . . . for any matter of form . . . the plaintiff . . . may commence a new…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carbone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Fiorilla v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Long v. Zoning Commission of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Connecticut Society of Architects, Inc. v. Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Sipperley v. Board of Appeals on ZoningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
3Cited by24 opinions
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Sheehan v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- City of Waterbury v. Waterbury Police UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Fishman v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.