Legal Opinion
Sipperley v. Board of Appeals on Zoning
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 14, 1953PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
On September 6, 1951, the named defendant, to be called the board, granted a variance of the zoning regulations of Westport to the defendants Theodore, H. and Stephen W. Hrivnock. The eleven plaintiffs, all taxpayers owning real estate in the immediate vicinity, appealed from the action of the board to the Court of Common Pleas. Their appeal was sustained, and from the judgment rendered thereon all defendants have appealed to this court.
It is conceded that the following facts were before the board: The Hrivnocks, whom we shall call the defendants, own a tract of land in the town of West-port.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Hoffman v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Burr v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Torello v. Board of Zoning Appeals of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fiorilla v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Kay Construction Co. v. County Council for Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Coral Reef Nurseries, Inc. v. Babcock Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Rocchi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.