Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Hilton Head No. 1 Public Service District
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided October 6, 1999No. C.A.9:98-1572-23-76, 9:98-2972-23-43PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DUFFY, District Judge.
Out of heed to the premise that the federal district courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, this court made a sua sponte inquiry into the extent and implication of jurisdiction over the issues raised in the plaintiffs’ complaint, and the propriety of remand. Plaintiffs, taxpayers in the Hilton Head No. 1 Public Service District (the “District”), brought these two actions seeking refunds, damages, and declaratory relief from what they allege to be an unconstitutional assessment of state taxes. Based upon the immutable disfavor of federal interference in matters…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tully v. Griffin, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Campbell v. Hilton Head No. 1 Public Service DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- District Lock and Hardware, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Tomaiolo v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2001