Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National Insurance Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action at law against defendant on a policy of health and accident insurance, claiming the sum of nine hundred dollars ($900) and reasonable attorneys’ fees. In his complaint he alleges that in the application for the insurance there appeared certain questions, and the application was filled out by the agent of the insurance company without asking those particular questions, and without reading or informing the plaintiff of either questions or answers that were written therein. The questions and answers referred to are as follows:

“IB. Are your habits of life correct and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. James v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Comer v. World Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. DeJonge v. Mutual of EnumclawOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Insurance Company of North America v. BrehmOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Coldiron v. McKenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API