Coldiron v. McKenzie
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.
This is an action on a promissory note executed by defendant. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a partnership for the purpose of mining gold. The venture failed. Defendant contends that the note in this action was a part of a series of transactions relating to the adjustment of the respective interests of plaintiff and defendant in the defunct partnership after the mining venture had failed.
In response to plaintiff’s complaint, defendant’s answer admits the execution of the note, but interposes four affirmative defenses: (1) that there was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- McEwen v. McEwenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Gellert v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Obermeier v. Mortgage Co. Holland-AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David M. Scott Construction Corp. v. FarrellOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Ben Rybke Co. v. Royal Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Ben Rybke Co. v. Royal Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Coldiron v. McKenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1971