Legal Opinion

Cissell v. Hanover Insurance

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided November 4, 1986No. Civ. A. 82-28PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of the defendants Stucker and Wilding, both officers of the Kentucky State Police, for partial summary judgment on those portions of this action which present claims for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 analogous to malicious prosecution claims and pendent state claims based on the same facts. The case is somewhat unusual and rather complex, but the facts relevant to the disposition of the present motions may be briefly stated as follows.

The defendants and other law enforcement officers were conducting an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Raine v. DrasinKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Konon v. FornalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
  4. Van Arsdale v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  5. Lindes v. SutterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dwayne Taylor and Charles D. Dixon v. Greg Gregg and City of Lubbock, Texas, MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Roesch v. OtarolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. S.E. Ex Rel. A.E. v. Grant County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Roesch v. OtarolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Butts v. City of Bowling GreenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API