Legal Opinion

Foster v. Murphy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 13, 1988No. 88 Civ. 2531 (MGC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

This is an action seeking to enjoin the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court from considering an appeal by the Manhattan District Attorney in a criminal prosecution of plaintiffs Daniel P. Foster and Kathleen M. Paolo. Plaintiffs, who appear pro se, claim that the appeal would violate their rights under the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment. Defendants, who are the Manhattan District Attorney and the Presiding Justice of the Appellate Division of New York State Supreme Court, First Department, have moved to dismiss…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gilliam v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Gilliam v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. Weinberg v. Revenue ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API