Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gilliam v. Foster

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1995No. 95-2334Published

1DissentLuttig, Circuit Judge

In an extraordinary decision, this court has just stayed a state trial of three defendants charged with murder and lynching, literally while the jury is hearing testimony. I dissent.

In my view, the majority has thrust itself into the affairs of the State of South Carolina in disregard of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and has, in violation of the plain command of Arizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497, 98 S.Ct. 824, 54 L.Ed.2d 717 (1978), substituted its view for that of the state trial and federal district courts on the quintessential discretionary issue of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API