Legal Opinion
Gallo v. Moen, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 23, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-CV-02440PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER [Resolving Docs. 51, 52, & 57] •
JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs are a class of retirees of Defendant Moen, Inc., their spouses, surviving spouses, and eligible dependents1 and the United Automobile Workers union (the UAW). Plaintiffs say that Defendant Moen intends to end retirement healthcare benefits. Plaintiffs also say that the parties have long agreed these retirement benefits would be lifetime benefits that could not be taken away.2 In response, Moen says that the benefits are not vested lifetime benefits and, therefore, it may terminate the benefits.3
Often,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joseph Zino, Jr. v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019