Legal Opinion

Dallas City Railroad v. Beeman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1889No. 6336PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. A. 8. Lathrop. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Presiding Judge.

J. E. Beeman and wife brought this suit to recover damages for the loss of their infant son Fred Ernest Beeman, who was killed by being run over by one of appellant’s cars on the 16th day of December, 1884. It was alleged that the death of the child resulted from the incompetency and gross and willful negligence and recklessness of the driver in charge of the car.

Appellant answered by general denial, and specially that the child lost its life by reason of its own thoughtless, negligent act in attempting to-cross the track just in front of the car while it was being…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Southern Cotton Press & Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. CowserTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. H. & T. C. R. R. Co. v. MyersTexas Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Napier v. MooneyhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Granberry v. Texas Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Morton Salt Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API