Legal Opinion
In Re Boeing Securities Litigation
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 8, 1998No. C97-1715ZPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ZILLY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the motion of defendants The Boeing Company, Philip M. Condit, Boyd E. Gi-van, and Ronald Woodard to dismiss plaintiffs’ Consolidated Complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (docket no. 67). The Court, having considered the defendants’ motion and all pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to that motion, and having heard oral argument on August 5, 1998, hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion to dismiss.
SUMMARY OF DECISION
On July 21, 1997, Boeing announced sales of $9.3 billion and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Nice Systems, Ltd. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- In Re Intelligroup Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- In Re Immune Response Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Grant v. Aurora Loan Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.