Legal Opinion

Downing v. Mayes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1894PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cass county; the Hon. Lyman Lacey, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was a petition for partition, brought by Caroline Mayes (who was formerly the widow of William R. Strickland) and the heirs of Strickland, for partition of the north-east quarter of the south-east quarter of section 31, and the north-west quarter of the south-west quarter of section 32, township 17, range 12, west, in Cass county. Jesse Mayes and Finis E. Downing were made defendants to the petition.

William R. Strickland died in March, 1870, and it is claimed that he owned the two tracts of land at the time of his death, and that the lands then descended to his widow and children. As to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kerr v. HittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Crispen v. HannavanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Turney v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Rayner v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Brooks v. BruynIllinois Supreme Court · 1857

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. SchultzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bruch v. Benedict Barnes Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Scott v. Jardine Gold Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Kirby v. KirbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Burns v. CurranIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API