Legal Opinion

Lynch v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 31, 1936PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of tort brought by the plaintiff to recover for the conscious suffering and death of her late husband, Thomas Lynch (hereinafter referred to as Lynch), while he was in the employ of the defendant. The action was brought under the Federal employers’ liability act (35 U. S. Sts. at Large, 65, c. 149, 36 U. S. Sts. at Large, 291, c. 143; U. S. C. Title 45, §§ 51-59) against the defendant, and was tried on a substitute declaration. The defendant’s exceptions relate solely to the allowance of the plaintiff’s substitute declaration.

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Mucha v. Northeastern Crushed Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Hietala v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Cantley v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API