Legal Opinion

Roushlange v. Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1888No. 13,207PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

It is averred in appellant’s complaint that the railway company had constructed its road across his land 41 after purchase made and consideration paid for the right of way by the defendant to the plaintiff, and after the plaintiff had conveyed the right of way to the defendant by a good and sufficient deed.” It is averred, also, that á portion of the land over which the railroad was constructed was marshy; that through that portion the railway company made an embankment about twelve feet high; that, after the road had been used for about six months, the embankment, thus constructed, began to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. HornIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. White Water Valley Railroad v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. BrewerTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Calumet National Bank as Trustee Under Trust No. P-3362 v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GriswoldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API