Legal Opinion

Railway Express Agency v. Huntress ex rel. Royal Ins. Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1947No. 466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

In April 1944 George S. Huntress, then in the United States Army and stationed in Louisiana, delivered a saxophone, case and accessories, hereinafter referred to as the saxophone, to Railway Express Agency for transportation to himself at his home in Washington, D. C. He was named both as consignor and consignee in the uniform express receipt, which stated the declared value of the saxophone to be $400. Delivery of the saxophone was not made promptly and Mrs. Katherine V. Huntress, mother of George, made claim for loss against the Royal Insurance Company, with whom she…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. The Ansaldo San Giorgio I v. Rheinstrom Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Okin v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. GrundyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Southern Express Co. v. HanawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schuppin v. Unification ChurchDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1977
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. NewmyerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API