Legal Opinion
Tracy v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 31, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 89-137-JLLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
Raymond Tracy and his wife, Terri, instituted this action seeking damages from Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”). The damages arise from an accident that took place on December 13, 1987, when a Conrail train struck the tractor-trailer Mr. Tracy was driving. After the Tracys filed the action in Delaware state court, Conrail removed the suit to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Conrail now moves to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).1
Sectio…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Robert S. Solomon v. Continental American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschaapij BV v. Apollo Computer Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Affymetrix, Inc. v. Synteni, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Williams v. National Housing Exchange Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995