Purcell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Deew,
This is an action in assumpsit instituted by Mary P. Purcell, the designated beneficiary, for the proceeds of an insurance policy upon the life of her husband. The case has been tried three times. At the first trial, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff which, on defendant’s motion, was set aside and a new trial granted by the learned court below, the reasons for which not appearing of record. This court, sustaining one of plaintiff’s objections to a ruling on evidence by the learned trial judge, reversed the judgment entered on the verdict rendered for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Eaton v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Hamill v. Supreme Council of the Royal ArcanumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Hermany v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Kuhns v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. PetrilDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Kowatch v. RudnikDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Afflerbach v. Burns, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1946
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.