Legal Opinion

Kowatch v. Rudnik

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 15555PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

In this diversity action, the plaintiff Kowatch was a guest passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant Boysza. The Boysza car collided head on with an automobile owned and operated by the defendant Rudnik. The plaintiff did not attend the trial because of illness.

Defendant Rudnik, called on behalf of plaintiff for cross-examination, testified that driver Boysza was on the wrong side of the road and caused the collision; Mrs. Boysza, called for plaintiff, gave testimony from which it could be inferred that Rudnik was on the wrong side of the road and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Globe Cereal Mills v. Shirlee S. ScrivenerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Peter J. Zegan v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Antonelli v. TumoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Engemann v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API