Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Petril
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
Is it against the public policy of Pennsylvania to permit recovery by the beneficiary of an insurance policy on the life of a murderer convicted and executed for his crime ?
This issue is presented in the instant action for a declaratory judgment brought by the plaintiff insurance company to determine its obligation on a policy of life insurance written by it.
The facts as they appear in the complaint are as follows:
On May 18, 1936, the plaintiff insurance company issued a policy on the life of Paul Petrillo in the amount of $5,000 with a beneficiary clause in favor of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Smith EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Delaware County · 1955