Legal Opinion

Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Petril

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1942No. 1727 CivilPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

Is it against the public policy of Pennsylvania to permit recovery by the beneficiary of an insurance policy on the life of a murderer convicted and executed for his crime ?

This issue is presented in the instant action for a declaratory judgment brought by the plaintiff insurance company to determine its obligation on a policy of life insurance written by it.

The facts as they appear in the complaint are as follows:

On May 18, 1936, the plaintiff insurance company issued a policy on the life of Paul Petrillo in the amount of $5,000 with a beneficiary clause in favor of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Smith EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Delaware County · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API