Legal Opinion
Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided March 31, 2006No. 1-03-1402PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Mara Frossard
Plaintiff Lucy Mydlach brought this action against defendant DaimlerChrysler Corporation under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty— Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act (Act or Magnuson-Moss Act) (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. (2000)) after she purchased a used car manufactured by defendant which was allegedly defective. Plaintiff’s three-count complaint alleged breach of written warranty (count I), breach of implied warranty of merchantability (count II), and revocation of acceptance (count III). Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that plaintiffs claims were barred by the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Bonaguro v. the County Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- John F. "Jack" Walsh v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Morris v. MargulisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Oggi Trattoria & Caffe, Ltd. v. Isuzu Motors America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Shoop v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Zwicky v. Freightliner Custom Chassis Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Mattuck v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.