Legal Opinion

In Re Initiative Petition No. 260, State Question No. 377

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 19, 1956No. 37313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

298 P.2d 753 (1956)

In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 260, STATE QUESTION NO. 377.

T.M. KIRK, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

Andy ANDERSON, Secretary of State, Defendant in Error.

No. 37313.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 19, 1956.

Rehearing Denied June 26, 1956.

Paul W. Updegraff, Norman, for plaintiff in error.

Leon Shipp, George Fagin, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

W.R. Wallace, Jr., Oklahoma City, amicus curiae on behalf of plaintiff in error.

2Per curiam

This is a proceeding from an action of the Secretary of State holding valid Initiative Petition No. 260, State Question No. 377, proposing an amendment to the…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Initiative Petition No. 2 of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. In Re Initiative State Question No. 10Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. In Re Bruner's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 249Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. In Re State Question No. 236, Referendum Petition No. 73Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. In Re the Appeal of BraddySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Plymale v. GarnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ritchie v. HendersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. IN RE STATE QUESTION No. 813, INITIATIVE PETITION No. 429Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API