Legal Opinion
In Re Bruner's Guardianship
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 31, 1925No. 12570PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant, as they were designated in the trial court.
On the 29th day of January, 1917, the defendant, C. A. Popkin, was appointed guardian of the person and estate of Jesse Bruner, a minor, by the county court of Creek county. On the 17th day of February, 1921, Lena Smith, the mother of said ward filed a petition in said county court charging: (1) That said guardian had allowed and paid out of the funds of the estate of said ward certain bills for accessories and supplies for an automobile belonging to said ward, which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Thomas v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- In Re Guardianship of ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Checote v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- McDougal v. KerseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 281, St. Question No. 441Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- In Re the Guardianship of the Estate of ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 260, State Question No. 377Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- In Re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Ritchie v. HendersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.