Legal Opinion

Lind v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1995No. 9312-08151; CA A83422PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of our opinion in Lind v. Allstate Ins. Co., 134 Or App 395, 895 P2d 327 (1995). We allow the motion and adhere to our opinion as amplified below.

In our opinion, we held that the arbitration clause in defendant’s uninsured motorist insurance policy was enforceable notwithstanding ORS 742.504(10) 1 because, under the reasoning of Molodyh v. Truck Insurance Exchange, 304 Or 290, 744 P2d 992 (1987), that statute violates Article I, section 17, of the Oregon Constitution. Plaintiff now argues:

“Molodyh is inapplicable because (1) [this] court incorrectly concluded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lind v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Malek v. Atlantic Mutual CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Bonds v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Sanderson v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Bonds v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API