Legal Opinion

United States v. Manuel Mendoza Torres, Max Candido Griego, Sarah Godoy and Susan Smith Spiegel

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1981No. 81-1102 to 81-1105PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

The above named defendants-appellants seek reversal of convictions based on charges having to do with conspiring to rob a federally insured national bank with the use of dangerous weapons contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d). Also charged in the indictment against all four defendants was the substantive crime of actual robbery of the bank, together with aiding and abetting that crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2. In addition, Sarah Sotello Godoy and Max Candido Griego were charged with possession of a firearm by a former felon in violation of 18…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeffrey A. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. David Allen MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Oliver v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Albright v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Albright v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API