United States v. Manuel Mendoza Torres, Max Candido Griego, Sarah Godoy and Susan Smith Spiegel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The above named defendants-appellants seek reversal of convictions based on charges having to do with conspiring to rob a federally insured national bank with the use of dangerous weapons contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d). Also charged in the indictment against all four defendants was the substantive crime of actual robbery of the bank, together with aiding and abetting that crime under 18 U.S.C. § 2. In addition, Sarah Sotello Godoy and Max Candido Griego were charged with possession of a firearm by a former felon in violation of 18…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Jeffrey A. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. David Allen MerrittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Oliver v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Albright v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Albright v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.