Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Forsyth v. Brigner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1999No. 99-165PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

In his propositions of law, Forsyth asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his mandamus action. For the following reasons, Forsyth’s contentions lack merit.

First, Forsyth’s claim for a writ of mandamus to prohibit Judge Brigner from enforcing his order is, in fact, a request for a prohibitory injunction, which the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction to grant. State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 425, 426-427, 687 N.E.2d 283, 284.

Second, Judge Brigner acted within his discretion in limiting Forsyth’s access to the domestic relations court, given…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Enyart v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Lanham v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Smith v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mayer v. BristowOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Butler County Children Services Board v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Evans v. KlaegerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Dayton Law Library Ass'n v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API