Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Bristow
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 2000No. 1999-2216, 2000-0056PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
On June 1, 1998, plaintiff-appellant, James J. Mayer, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney of Richland County, Ohio, filed a complaint in the Crawford County Court of Common Pleas to have defendant-appellee, Lonny Lee Bristow, declared a “vexatious litigator” pursuant to R.C. 2323.52. In his answer, Bristow admitted to “all of the allegations contained in the complaint.”
Bristow’s admission to being a vexatious litigator was apparently made as part of a plea agreement in a criminal case, which is described in State v. Bristow (Mar. 26, 1999), Wyandot App. No. 3-98-24, unreported, 1999 WL 254098, as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert Procup v. C. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Miller v. GunckleOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Helfrich v. Hall & Clerk of CourtsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- McClure v. Fischer Attached HomesClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2007
- In re HelfrichOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ek v. BoggsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.