Legal Opinion
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1958PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
This action is brought by the Government to enjoin a proposed merger between the defendants, Bethlehem Steel Corporation and The Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company on the ground that it would be in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended. 1 Specifically, the Government seeks to enjoin the consummation of a Reorganization Plan and Agreement dated December 11, 1956 under which the defendant Bethlehem is to acquire the assets and properties of the defendant Youngstown.
The case presents the problem of the interpretation and application of the 1950 amendment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Dalton v. City of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- United States v. Johns-Manville CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.