Legal Opinion
Dalton v. City of Honolulu
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1969No. 4852PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
KOBAYASHI, J.
Plaintiffs filed suit on March 6, 1968. The amended complaint seeks (1) a declaratory judgment that Honolulu Ordinances 2840, 2841, 2913 and 3131 are null and void, and (2) an injunction restraining enactment of further ordinances relating to the land in question.
Jurisdiction in the circuit court was apparently based upon HRS § 632-1 and H.R.C.P. Rule 57.
Ordinances 2840 and 2841 were approved August 25, 1966. Ordinance 2840 purports to amend the General Plan *401of the City and County of Honolulu by changing the permitted land use for a 46.922 acre area of land…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Life of the Land v. LAND USE COM'N, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Town v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- East Diamond Head Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- Application of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Dalton v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.