Legal Opinion
Quintana v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 26, 1999No. AC 18421PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The petitioner, Jose Quintana, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly determined that he was not entitled to a new trial. Specifically, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly failed to find that, at his trial, he was deprived of his constitutional rights (1) to due process of law, (2) to confront the witnesses against him and (3) to effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Milner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Elsey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Daniel v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Walker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.