Legal Opinion

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Friedman

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1994No. 22434PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Lawyer Disciplinary Board of the West Virginia State Bar petitioned this Court to suspend Jack O. Friedman from the practice of law for one month. The Board alleges that Mr. Friedman violated Rule 8.1(b) of the W.Va. Rules of Professional Conduct [1989]1 by failing to respond to the *360Bar’s Chief Disciplinary Counsel’s information requests concerning a complaint filed by James D. Midkiff, C.D. Although the Board found no ethical violation in Mr. Friedman’s actions regarding Dr. Midkiff, the Board found Mr. Friedman’s failure to respond to the Bar’s disciplinary counsel’s inquiries a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. MullinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. ComettiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Suspension of JosephSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API