Legal Opinion
Beardmore v. T. D. Burgess Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 9, 1967No. [No. 76, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOppenheimer, J.
In a tort action of deceit based on an alleged fraudulent misrepresentation in the sale of a house and lot that the house "had a public sewer connection, the court below directed a verdict for the defendant-appellees on the ground that the plaintiff-appellants had not offered evidence to show that the fair market value of the property on the date of purchase, without the connection, was less than the contract price and that evidence as to the cost of providing the connection was inadmissible. We disagree.
The appellants brought an action in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Spargnapani v. WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Big Pool Holstein Farms, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Nunn v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Shane v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Dresser v. Sunderland Apartments Tenants Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Western Contracting Corp. v. Bechtel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Goldstein v. MilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Hinkle v. Rockville Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.