Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Dickerson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 17, 1867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Court. Appellants (Spear and Sheean) were the sureties of their co-defendant, Dickerson, on his official bond, as justice of the peace. The facts tending to. and which were held by the District Court sufficient to fix their liability, will be found referred to in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

1. Official boot.: liabiiity of sureties. On the 12th of September, 1861, plaintiff left with Dickerson, then a justice of the peace, a note on one Squires, for collection: upon which he u . T recovered ludgment on the 6th oi January, " *- °3 1862, and which was paid in full. The then term of office of the justice expired in December, 1862, and he was elected his own successor; giving a new bond in January 1863.

In September, 1863, the sureties on this bond applied, under sections 652-655, to the proper officer to be released, and that their principal give a new bond. The order was made, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farrar and Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. U. States v. Giles & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  3. County of Mahaska v. IngallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Myers v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1839
  5. Bigelow v. BridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anaheim Union Water Co. v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. District Township of Fox v. McCordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Ind. School Dist. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. Brooke v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API