Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brooke v. American Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 15, 1927Published

1DissentDe Graff, J.

(dissenting). — I respectfully dissent from the conclusion of the majority. I realize that a dissent is of little importance in the particular case, but it may be more or less educative, and, at any rate, records the reaction of the dissenter.

This is an action on a bond against the defendant surety company only. The real party as to the liability in question is the first surety, not a defendant, and the trial court refused his being made a party. The primary question is whether the bond of the instant defendant is a substitute bond. It is my contention that the record facts and the law make…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Westervelt v. MohrenstecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Van Buren County v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Curtis v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Ellyson v. LordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API