Legal Opinion
United States v. Ferrell T. Riley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1996No. 95-2694, 95-2778 and 95-2781PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
A criminal defendant convicted of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) “shall forfeit” his or her interests in the RICO enterprise, assets acquired in violation of the Act, and any proceeds of racketeering activity. 18 U.S.C. § 1963(a). After a RICO indictment, but prior to the defendant’s conviction, the district court may enter orders “to preserve the availability” of property subject to forfeiture. § 1963(d)(1). These appeals challenge preconviction orders appointing a monitor, and later a receiver, to manage companies allegedly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Alan Masters, Michael J. Corbitt, and James D. KeatingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Aviation Supply Corporation v. R.S.B.I. Aerospace, Inc., Ross BarberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. SarbelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re NajawiczSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- United States v. William ChamberlainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. GottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. EspadaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.