New York Life Ins. v. Rutherford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). After the application was received by the agent, and the first premium was paid, nothing remained to be done by the insured to make the contract effective. There was no provision that the insured should be in good health at the time of the delivery of the policy. His state of health at that time was not mentioned in the policy or in the application. The only conditions were that the insurance applied for should not take ef*709feet unless the first premium were paid and the policy delivered to, and received by, the insured during his lifetime.
On the trial the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Unterharnscheidt v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Fried v. . Royal Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Bradley v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Going v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jones v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1936
- Morford v. California Western States Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Field v. Missouri Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. OllichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Frye v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.